Troubleshooting Wireless / WiFi Problems
Performance and stability of wireless / Wi-Fi / 802.11 networks:
Solving wireless problems can be
tricky, but it's not rocket science.
There are a few basic concepts to understand, but your
success most likely will depend on your own observations and
detective skills. In
the end, the majority of problems can be traced to RF interference,
misdirected antennas and "dead spots". Four things to keep in mind
as you tackle a WiFi-related problem:
1. It is most
likely caused by interference, the existence of "dead spots", or
poor reception that can be corrected by better locating/aligning an
antenna.
2. The beacon strength of an access point is not a measure of the
performance of your wireless network.
Nor do you want to necessary associate with the access point
with the strongest beacon signal.
3. In 802.11 b/g you have a choice of 14 channels (actually, 11
channels in North America) - where each channel is a range of
frequencies. There is
tremendous overlap among adjacent channels (take a quick look at the
image at the bottom of this page).
The reason why it's important to make note of the overlap is
that a wireless device that transmits in the frequency range of
channel 1 not only interferes with channel 1 but probably also is
wrecking havoc on channels 2, 3, etc…
4. When interference is the cause of poor performance, then the most
common solution is to reconfigure your access point to use a
different channel. In
certain situations you may need to track down the source of
interference, but more often than not it will be coming from a
source or location you have no control over.
So, the simplest "fix" is to identify a channel that isn't
subject to interference and reconfigure your wireless network to use
that channel.
To get a jump-start in
troubleshooting interference-related problems that degrade the
performance of your Wi-Fi network, then check-out some of our
low-cost wireless diagnostic tools...
Troubleshooting Tips:
Can network discovery / WiFi scanning / site survey tools
(e.g. NetStumbler, NetSurveyor) be used to solve interference
problems?
No.
These applications use an 802.11 wireless device that employs
a chipset and protocol that only sees 802.11 packets – that is, it
does not measure general RF transmissions.
In fact, the site survey tool could be sitting next to a
microwave oven that was emitting tons of RF energy and it wouldn’t
see it (since the format of those transmissions do not conform to
the 802.11 standard). A
Wi-Fi site survey tool is designed to measure Wi-Fi coverage by
measuring the signal strength of the beacon emitted by an access
point. The beacon strength of an access point is a reflection of how
close the access point is to you – and does not provide any clue as
to the presence or absence of other interfering wireless devices.
An RF spectrum analyzer is the tool of choice when it comes
to detecting / measuring general RF transmissions that could be
interfering with a WiFi network.
When your network discovery wizard reports a
list of available wireless networks (i.e. access points) to
associate with you should always choose the one with the strongest
signal strength -- 'True', 'False' or 'Maybe'?
False. The keyword in the above
statement is 'always'. If 'always' is left out then the answer is
'Maybe'. All else being equal and without any diagnostic tools at
your disposal then, yes, choose the wireless network with the
strongest signal strength. But here is why that may not be your
best choice. The signal strength reported by the network discovery
wizard is the signal strength of a beacon. Each access point (AP)
sends out a short pulse or beacon of information approximately every
100 mSec. It's equivalent to an 'I'm over here!' shout. It does
not expect a response from the 802.11 client adapters that may hear
it -- it's just a one-way shout. The signal strength that the
network discovery wizard reports is the signal strength of a beacon,
and the signal strength of a beacon is a reflection of how close
that AP is located to you. It is not a reflection of
the performance or throughput you can expect by associating with
that AP -- rather, it is an indication of the AP's physical location
relative to you. If the AP with the strongest beacon has 24 client
adapters associated with it that are actively transmitting and
receiving information then you will be customer 25 and your network
connection will seem slow. On the other hand, if you instead choose
to associate with an AP whose beacon strength is weaker but which is
not associated with other client adapters, then you will likely
experience better performance. Furthermore, the AP with the
strongest beacon signal may be using a channel that is subject to RF
interference -- again, degrading its performance. The point we'd
like to emphasize is that the key to performance is 'throughput',
and though signal strength can affect that so will the number of
client adapters that are competing for the same AP and the presence
or absence of RF interference. To learn more check-out our
NetStress tool.Can a Wi-Fi packet sniffer be used to solve interference problems?
No – for the same reason as
above. An 802.11 packet sniffer can only see 802.11 packets and can
not measure general RF transmissions.
If RF interference is a problem then, as a side effect, the
packet sniffer might report an increase in packet retransmissions
and lower data rates, but it can not be used to solve interference
problems.Besides competing 802.11
networks, what are some examples of other sources of interference?
There are a tremendous number of
802.11 devices in use and they can interfere with your wireless
network – which is referred to as
co-channel and adjacent channel interference.
However, 802.11 is a very robust protocol that was designed
to accommodate multiple wireless devices.
Also, since 802.11 devices follow the same protocol they can
work cooperatively - that is, two access points on the same channel
can arbitrate use of the shared channel.
In most environments the presence
of non-802.11 devices dwarfs the number of 802.11 devices. These
non-802.11 devices could include microwave ovens, cordless phones,
Bluetooth devices, wireless video cameras, wireless security
devices, outdoor microwave links, wireless game controllers, Zigbee
devices, fluorescent lights, motion detectors, automation sensors,
WiMAX, and so on. Even bad electrical connections can cause broad RF
spectrum emissions. Non-802.11 types of interference can
significantly impact the performance of a wireless network by
causing a loss of data throughput. In addition they can cause
secondary effects such as rate back-off, in which retransmissions
caused by interference trick 802.11 devices into thinking that they
should use lower data rates for backward compatibility with
older/slower 802.11 devices.If your
wireless network “appears” to be working, could interference still
be a problem?
Yes.
Though 802.11 is a robust protocol that was designed to be
resilient to interference from other wireless devices, its
performance can be degraded by other wireless devices that transmit
in the same bandwidth. When an 802.11 device detects RF interference
then it will delay its own transmissions. As a result, though 802.11
packets generally reach their destination, the performance and
throughput of your wireless are negatively impacted. Whether they are degraded to the extent that users notice the
problem depends on how heavily the network is used and whether or
not it is important to users that the wireless network perform
optimally.Is it sufficient to perform a
single RF sweep during installation to identify all sources of
interference?
No.
It is important to understand that, by nature, sources of
interference come and go.
New wireless devices are being installed all the time.
Some devices run continuously – while others are used only at
certain times of the day.
There is nothing to be alarmed about, just take note that a
single RF sweep on Tuesday morning doesn’t assure you that your
environment is free of RF interference.If
there is a problem with the wireless network, is testing for RF
interference one of the first or last things to check for?
One of the first…
In any communication network (wired or wireless) you need to
have confidence that the physical layer is solid and intact.
For example, in the case of a wired network, if the Ethernet
cable is disconnected then why worry about troubleshooting the
higher level protocols?
When we connect a computer to a wired, Ethernet network and the
machine cannot communicate with other devices on the network then
the first thing we check is that the cable is properly attached and
the link lights on network adapter indicate the physical layer is
functional. The same is
true of a wireless network, except there are no cables or link
lights. Whereas with a
wired network we don’t worry so much about the physical layer
because once a computer has been connected to a network and has been
working for awhile then its rare for a cable to come unattached or
to break, the same is not true for a wireless network.
In the case of a wireless network, the quality of the
physical connection can frequently change as new wireless devices or
obstructions are introduced into the local environment that create
interference or dead spots.
If RF interference is a problem, then what’s the solution?
Two choices: (a) if you know the
source of the interference and it is an unnecessary device then
remove it, or (b) reconfigure your wireless network to use a
different channel that is not subject to RF interference.
In our experience, (b) is the more likely solution since in a
busy environment not only is it difficult to track down the source
of the interference it may not be directly under your control (e.g.
from an adjacent business or a neighbor).
So, assuming not all 802.11 channels are subject to
interference, choose a channel that will give better performance.
A 2.4 GHz spectrum analyzer is the tool of choice for detecting
and identifying sources of RF interference.
Spectrum analyzers are a basic
tool used for observing radio frequency (RF) signals – they give you
a better picture of the RF environment to help identify and find
devices interfering with your Wireless LAN (WLAN).
Typically they’ll employ a 2-dimensional display where the
vertical axis (Y-axis) represents the magnitude of a signal and the
horizontal axis (X-axis) represents the frequency of a signal.
Dedicated hardware spectrum analyzers can run into the tens
of thousands of dollars (they employ many arrays of
analog-to-digital converters).
Recently, PC-based analyzers have appeared on the market.
Yet they are also expensive – in the neighborhood of $4000.
Check-out some of our
low-cost wireless diagnostic tools that help you detect the presence of
interfering devices and then choose the best channel for your
wireless network.
Nuts About Nets, LLC develops
innovative diagnostic tools for installing, optimizing and
troubleshooting 802.11 (Wi-Fi) wireless networks. Our tools
include RF spectrum analyzers, 802.11 channel analyzers, 2.4x and
5.x GHz channel /
signal generators, and 802.11 packet injectors. Our low-cost products offer an unbeatable value
-- they are easy to use, sensitive, accurate and a fraction of the
cost of proprietary hardware test equipment.